Tuesday, 27 August 2013
Results, error calculations and corrosion rate
Table 1- Corrosion Rate of Magnesium in stagnant solution
Test Tube Number Amount of NaCl in Tube (g) Weight of Magnesium strip (g)
weights used to estimate weight loss Dissolved Oxygen content (mg/L) Density (cm3) Volume (cm3) Corrosion Rate (mmpy)
1 1.0 Original: 0.010
Test 1: 0.015
Test 2: 0.008 7.4 3.3 0.003 12.3
2 0.5 Original: 0.033
Test 1: 0.017
Test 2: 0.007 6.8 11.0 0.003 8.3
3 0.3 Original: 0.016
Test 1: 0.013
Test 2: 0.007 6.6 5.3 0.003 5.7
Table 2- Corrosion Rate of Magnesium in aerated solution
Test Tube Number Amount of NaCl in Tube (g) Weight of Magnesium strip (g)
weights used to estimate weight loss Dissolved Oxygen content (mg/L) Density
(cm3) Volume
(cm3) Corrosion Rate (mmpy)
1 1.0 Original: 0.007
Test 1: 0.003
Test 2:
nil 7.9 2.3 0.003 52.9
2 0.5 Original: 0.012
Test 1: 0.005
Test 2:
nil 6.5 4.0 0.003 30.4
3 0.3 Original: 0.012
Test 1: 0.005
Test 2:
nil 7.8 4.0 0.003 30.4
Table 3- Corrosion Rate of Zinc in stagnant solution
Test Tube Number Amount of NaCl in Tube (g) Weight of Zinc strip (g)
weights used to estimate weight loss Dissolved Oxygen content (mg/L) Density
(cm3) Volume
(cm3) Corrosion Rate (mmpy)
1 1.0 Original: 0.221
Test 1: 0.220
Test 2:
0.218 6.1 12.3 0.018 2.0
2 0.5 Original: 0.190
Test 1: 0.191
Test 2:
0.189 6.0 10.6 0.018 2.3
3 0.3 Original: 0.211
Test 1: 0.211
Test 2:
0.210 5.9 11.7 0.018 2.1
Table 4- Corrosion Rate of Zinc in aerated solution
Test Tube Number Amount of NaCl in Tube (g) Weight of Zinc strip (g)
weights used to estimate weight loss Dissolved Oxygen content (mg/L) Density
(cm3) Volume
(cm3) Corrosion Rate (mmpy)
1 1.0 Original: 0.284
Test 1: 0.282
Test 2:
0.281 9.6 15.8 0.018 7.7
2 0.5 Original: 0.258
Test 1: 0.258
Test 2:
0.256 9.5 14.3
0.018 4.3
3 0.3 Original: 0.280
Test 1: 0.281
Test 2:
0.280 7.8 15.6 0.018 *Not enough change to even make an estimate as to the amount of corrosion
Calculations:
Error and Uncertainty-
Table 1:
% uncertainty for weight of magnesium strip (test 1):
% uncertainty= 0.05/0.01 × 100=500%
% uncertainty for weight of magnesium strip (test 2):
% uncertainty= 0.05/0.033 × 100=151.5%
% uncertainty for weight of magnesium strip (test 3):
% uncertainty= 0.05/0.016 × 100=312.5%
Table 2:
% uncertainty for weight of magnesium strip (aerated-test 1):
% uncertainty= 0.05/0.007 × 100=714.3%
% uncertainty for weight of magnesium strip (aerated-test 2):
% uncertainty= 0.05/0.012 × 100=416.7%
% uncertainty for weight of magnesium strip (aerated-test 3):
% uncertainty= 0.05/0.012 × 100=416.7%
Table 3:
% uncertainty for weight of zinc strip (test 1):
% uncertainty= 0.05/0.221 × 100=22.6%
% uncertainty for weight of zinc strip (test 2):
% uncertainty= 0.05/0.190 × 100=26.3%
% uncertainty for weight of zinc strip (test 3):
% uncertainty= 0.05/0.211 × 100=23.7%
Table 4:
% uncertainty for weight of zinc strip (aerated)(test 1):
% uncertainty= 0.05/0.284 × 100=17.6%
% uncertainty for weight of zinc strip (aerated)(test 2):
% uncertainty= 0.05/0.258 × 100=19.4%
% uncertainty for weight of zinc strip (aerated)(test 3):
% uncertainty= 0.05/0.280 × 100=17.8%
Corrosion Rate:
All corrosion rates were calculated based on the formula;
mmpy=87.6 × W/DAT
where W=weight loss in grams; A= area of metal;D=metal density;
T=time exposed
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment